Jindal SAW Ltd: Court notice to Jindal SAW Ltd

Gandhinagar, March 28 (IANS) The Gujarat High Court has given come to find to Jindal SAW Limited and others in a litigation alleging irregularities of the establishment to have a proposed public hearing and starting making without environmental clearance for it is new unit at Mundra in Kutch district.

The petitioners, Mahesh Solanki and Aniruddhsinh Jethwa, residents of Samaghogha village in Mundra taluka of Kutch, undergo put forward a petition in the public interest before the first bench of the court. The petitioners, through their advocate Anand Yagnik, claimed the company's imagine falls under category B and for which prior environmental clearance is mandatory.

They claimed that when the clearance is yet to be received from the state level expert appraisal committee, Jindal Saw Limited, has started making at the proposed site.

'This is clear violation of the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 as amended and instructions issued by respondent Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India under the Environment Rules and Environment Act,' the petitioners claimed.

Advocate Yagnik said, 'The Company presently has a manufacturing unit in the vicinity, manufacturing DI Pipes of unique sizes. This may be an extension of the pre&wshyp;existing unit. However, before getting prior environmental clearance no making of any nature can be put up except fencing and temporary shelter for guards. The construction is forecasted at a very solid quickness as if clearance is just a paper formality before much the public hearing takes place.'

He further said the venue of the public hearing on Tuesday is in the School which is for the duration of the premises of existing manufacturing unit of Jindal SAW Ltd and this is not a pale venue as vital and therefore needs to be changed.

The petitioners alleged that neither the summary, in a vernacular language, nor the Environmental Impact Assessment Report submitted by the project proponent is actually available with either the Gram Panchayat, or Mamlatdar office.

The PIL stated, for the purpose of 'Informed participation of villagers' in the public hearing, emulate of the entire Environmental Impact Assessment Report is required to be provided in vernacular language before actually public hearing takes place with a an adequate amount of gap between provision of the EIA Report of the proposed project in vernacular slang and the public hearing.

The petitioners have furthermore challenged the EIA notification of 2006 handed out by Ministry of Environment and Forests to the quantity that it permits provision of summary in vernacular language. They've challenged it on the ground such a such discrimination on the explanation of jargon violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India and it therefore is unconstitutional.
Source:http://in.finance.yahoo.com/news/Court-notice-Jindal-SAW-Ltd-ians-698583591.html